Establishment of an Accreditation Scheme for Children’s Contact Services - Option 3 – Moderate level regulatory regime, at both the organisation/provider and the individual practitioner level (medium intervention model) - Attorney-General's Department

Option 3 – Moderate level regulatory regime, at both the organisation/provider and the individual practitioner level (medium intervention model)

This option outlines the potential impacts of an accreditation model that focuses on the attributes of the children’s contact centre at both the organisational level and the individual practitioner level. It outlines potential additional costs to the economy arising from this approach. Feedback is sought in relation to this option. You may answer as many or as few questions as you like.

Please provide your comments on the costs and benefits of this accreditation model (Option 3).

The form of your response is open to you to determine the best way to convey your views, but could include:

commentary on individual cost categories or benefit categories across the different options (please refer to Attachment A for the current assumptions and methodology)
commentary on specific costing assumptions or alternate approaches to costing the identified cost/benefit
indicating additional costs or benefits to be included in the costing models
indicating costs or benefits currently included but which are not considered valid, and
indicating the extent to which any assumptions used align with your experience or understanding of the operation of a CCS.

If you have additional data sources to support alternative costing approaches, please provide alternative assumptions and calculations, or the data sources used.

Are there elements of the proposed Option 3 that will specifically support the sector?

Are there elements of the proposed Option 3 that will specifically hinder the sector?

When comparing this to the other Options, do you support this approach (Option 3)?